skip to main content

Mental health at work is a safety issue, not just a wellbeing initiative

Health and safety  | 5 minute read

Employee assistance programmes, wellbeing initiatives and resilience training can provide valuable support. However, when working conditions contribute to stress or poor mental health, organisations should also examine the underlying psychosocial risks and consider how they can be managed at source.

Key takeaways

1. Wellbeing support is not the same as risk prevention.
2. Psychosocial risks require a structured approach.
3. Prevention starts with how work is designed and managed.

Why it matters

As the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) launches its 2026-2028 Together for Mental Health at Work campaign this October, employers have an opportunity to look beyond workplace wellbeing and consider mental health through the same preventive lens applied to other occupational risks.¹

43%

of organisations reported time pressure as a workplace risk factor.2


10x

Employees experiencing the highest levels of time pressure were ten times more likely to experience job stress than those experiencing the lowest levels.3

Looking beyond wellbeing initiatives

There is an important distinction between supporting employee wellbeing and managing psychosocial risk.

Wellbeing initiatives generally focus on supporting the individual. They may provide access to counselling, promote physical activity, raise awareness of mental health or help employees develop strategies for managing pressure.

These measures can be valuable. However, psychosocial risk management asks a different question: which aspects of the work may be contributing to harm, and what reasonable measures could help to control those risks?

The HSA identifies potential causes of work-related stress such as:

  • excessive workloads;
  • conflicting demands and lack of role clarity;
  • limited involvement in decisions that affect the employee;
  • limited influence over how work is performed;
  • ineffective communication or inadequate support;
  • poorly managed organisational change;
  • job insecurity; and
  • bullying, harassment or violence.4

Where factors such as these are present, individual support may help employees manage their effects. However, support alone may not address the underlying workplace issue.

For example, resilience training is unlikely to resolve a workload that remains consistently unmanageable. Similarly, an Employee Assistance Programme may support an employee affected by inappropriate workplace behaviour, but it does not remove the need to address the behaviour itself.

Wellbeing measures and risk prevention can therefore complement one another, but they serve different purposes.

Applying a preventive approach

Effective prevention begins with identifying psychosocial hazards, assessing the risks they create and implementing appropriate controls. Employee participation is an important part of the process, helping organisations understand where work demands, systems or behaviours may be contributing to unnecessary pressure.⁴

Practical measures employers can consider

The appropriate controls will depend on the organisation and the findings of its risk assessment. 

Measures may include:

  • reviewing workloads, staffing levels and deadlines;
  • clarifying roles, responsibilities and reporting lines;
  • involving employees in decisions that affect their work;
  • improving communication during organisational change;
  • addressing bullying, harassment or other inappropriate behaviour; and
  • ensuring managers are equipped to respond to concerns.

The objective is not necessarily to eliminate all pressure from working life. Some pressure can be manageable or motivating. The priority is to identify circumstances in which workplace demands or conditions may create a foreseeable risk to health and to consider reasonable, proportionate controls.

Supporting employee wellbeing remains important. However, where work itself is contributing to poor mental health or work-related stress, prevention should also examine the work.

Want to see how we can help?

Managing psychosocial risks requires a clear understanding of how work is organised and where potential hazards may arise.

NFP’s Health & Safety consultants can support organisations in identifying psychosocial hazards and integrating appropriate controls into wider risk management systems.

Talk to NFP about taking a structured, preventive approach to psychosocial risk management.


General disclaimer

This insights article is not intended to address any specific situation or to provide legal, regulatory, financial, or other advice. While care has been taken in the production of this article, NFP does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of the article or any part of it and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. Any recipient shall be responsible for the use to which it puts this article. This article has been compiled using information available to us up to its date of publication.


NFP contributors

Dr. Paul Cummins, PhD.
CEO of SeaChange, an NFP company


References

  1. EU-OSHA, Healthy Workplaces Campaign 2026–2028: Together for Mental Health at Work (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
  2. EU-OSHA, Explore workplace risks in Europe: ESENER 2024 data visualisation (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work)
  3. ESRI/HSA, Job Stress and Working Conditions: Ireland in Comparative Perspective (Economic and Social Research Institute)
  4. HSA, Workplace Stress (AKA Work-Related Stress) (Health and Safety Authority) ⁠

https://www.nfpireland.ie/insights/articles/mental-health-at-work-is-a-safety-issue-not-just-a-wellbeing-initiative/
2026 Copyright | All Right Reserved